Refactor super() usage in classes #433
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The modifications have greatly boosted the readability of the code. It's not just clearer but also more concise. |
|
Great |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR addresses the use of the
super()function in the classes. Starting with Python 3,super()can be called without arguments in instance methods, automatically determining the class and self. This PR applies this simplification, enhancing the code's readability and maintainability.Changes
super(ClassName, self).__init__with the simplifiedsuper().__init__in the classes.Before
After
Benefits
super().Related Issue
Fixed: #432